Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 121 - 140 of 2,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
  Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v requests for unitary effect   On the other hand, proprietors from Asia and the US appear overall less enthusiastic relative to their proportion of European filings. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 2:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alexander, 919 F.3d 847, 852-53 (5th Cir. 2019) (academic speech enjoys First Amendment protection even if it occurs pursuant to a professor's official duties.); DeJohn v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 16 June 2023, Andrew Baker J quashed a prisoner governor’s decision to stop a man jailed for murder from talking to a journalist for a podcast about his appeal against conviction, R (Alexander) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 1407 (Admin). [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
The Cleveland State Law Review has published "Alexander Hamilton and Administrative Law: How America's First Great Public Administrator Informs and Challenges Our Understanding of Contemporary Administrative Law," by Rodger D. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]