Search for: "State v. Austria" Results 121 - 140 of 701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Therefore lawyers play a key role in ensuring that the courts, whose mission is fundamental in a State based on the rule of law, enjoy public confidence. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm by Julian Ku
Austria, no. 30141/04) finding that denying same-sex couples the right to marry does not violate a member state’s obligation under the European Convention of Human Rights. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
 In short, because the allegedly infringing content was available on a website that was accessible in Austria (the plaintiff’s country of residence, and the location of the court in which she sued), the damage occurred in Austria, and jurisdiction over the action is proper in Austria. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Junek parallel imported and sold sanitary preparations in Austria, including Debrisoft products. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Junek parallel imported and sold sanitary preparations in Austria, including Debrisoft products. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm by Bartolus
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-118/07 Commission v Finland on the need to amend existing bilateral agreements with non member countries concluded by a member State before it acceded to the EU. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
Moreover, significant historical events such as Algeria’s independence from France and Germany’s unification with Austria guided Irwin J to the conclusion that: … Clearly a state may go through enormous political and constitutional change, and indeed a radical change of territory, without shedding its international obligations. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:21 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This explains that the obligations that Article 8 of the ECHR implies for the requesting State applied in this case, contrary to what was the case in Povse v Austria, where the incidence of the Brussels IIbis Regulation was at stake. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(para. 58) This follows the reasoning in Lingens v Austria that value-judgments are afforded a much higher level of protection due to the fact that they cannot be the subject of proof. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:28 am by Adam Wagner
But the court went much further in a different case, Frodl v Austria, in which it effectively told Austria that almost all prisoners should be allowed to vote (see Carl Gardner’s post for a detailed comparison). [read post]