Search for: "State v. B. T." Results 121 - 140 of 18,305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm by Michael Douglas
  This follows from Art. 1(1) CISG, the treaty’s key application provision: This Convention applies to contracts of sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different States: (a) when the States are Contracting States; or (b) when the rules of private international law lead to the application of the law of a Contracting State. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The court didn't opine about how the privacy interests of the rape victim would stack up against the concerns about fairness to the defendant in the more typical scenario, where there was no judgment of liability against the defendant (as indeed there wasn't for the first stage of this very case). [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
It wasn’t until the end of the Cold War that they regained momentum, during a time known as the Holocaust Era Restitution Campaign. [read post]