Search for: "State v. Banks-Harvey" Results 121 - 129 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Tatum, No. 07-5733 A sentence for bank fraud is vacated where a sentencing enhancement for abusing a position of private trust under U.S.S.G. section 3B1.3 was erroneously applied as defendant did not occupy a position of trust nor possess "special skills". [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
Accordingly, we limit the holdings of Hook, Harvey, and Banks to the extent that they indicate that our State recognizes medical battery and hold that no independent cause of action for medical battery exists in South Carolina. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
As I explain in the section on 10b-5 in my Corporation Law and Economics text, the Supreme Court held Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
Law Blog Backgrounder: Here’s 1998’s Federal Circuit case State Street Bank v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]