Search for: "State v. Barbar" Results 121 - 140 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2015, 10:13 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015) Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has written a report on the recent Supreme Court of India case, Reserve Bank of India v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:47 am
However, in two published opinions in 2002 in the federal death penalty case of United States v. [read post]
Bigamy was for a long time a state crime; and it was declared a federal crime in 1862 by the Morrill Act, a law aimed specifically at the Mormons that was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1878 in Reynolds v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
Tewes | January 7, 2008 05:10 PM The death penalty is barbaric to begin with. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
  That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Tenenbaum found guilty of wilful copyright infringement, hit with $675,000 fine (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The IP Factor) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (IPKat)   Global Global - General Open core licensing: Arguments and applications (IP Osgoode) Wikipedia and rules… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am by Steve Hall
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by SO Issues
’s claims based on denial of due process, Justice Pfeifer, citing this court’s holding in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:19 am
The exhibition of performance of trained animals is permitted under Chapter V of the Act, of course, subject to certain restrictions mentioned therein. [read post]