Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 121 - 140
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The ninth week of the Leveson Inquiry heard from the PCC past and present, other regulators, private investigators, mobile phone security representatives and Baroness Sheila Hollins, who has personal experience of press intrusion – as the mother of Abigail Witchells, who was left paralysed from the neck down after being stabbed in the neck in 2005. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
The AmeriKat could not be more pleased with this response from the Scrutiny Committee – especially given that their November conclusion consisted solely of four very neutral and measured sentences stating that the proposals would continue to remain under scrutiny. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
March 2011 It emerged during that case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police, that the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and its chairman paid £20,000 to lawyer Mark Lewis in settlement of his libel claim arising out of comments made by Baroness Buscombe. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
The good Baroness's first post is on "Valuing Brands" and she writes: "Brands are worth a great deal to the economy so it’s vital that companies know the importance of protecting their intellectual property, particularly their trade marks and designs".Well, that's a good start. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
In a post about women barristers, Baroness Deech states that since the profession is now clearly open to women, the problem then becomes one of retention and the dilemma of balancing very long working hours and a young family. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
The state would have been open to criticism if it did not provide her with adequate protection. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
See Nicol J’s fascinating judgment in Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 for a condensed history of this litigation and our comment on it here. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
How do other EU Member States do it? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
As Baroness Hale said at paragraph 73: It is not statute, but the common law, indeed the rule of law itself, which imposes upon the Secretary of State the duty to comply with his own stated policy, unless he has a good reason to depart from it in the particular case at the particular time. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
