Search for: "State v. Berliner" Results 121 - 140 of 607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
To be on the safe side, the Bundesgerichtshof decided to stay the proceedings and referred the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:‘Is Article 5(3) of Regulation … 44/2001 to be interpreted as meaning that the harmful event occurred in one Member State (Member State A) if the tort or delict which forms the subject-matter of the proceedings or from which claims are derived was committed in another Member State (Member State B) and… [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
The Patently blog analyzes the decision in the matter of Intel Corporation, Dell, Inc., Microsoft Corporation et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
In the matter Olivia Rux et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:14 am
It remanded the matter to the district court. -- Basak Candar, Legal Assistant, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
On August 10, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the lower courts in the matter of Alexsandr Nikolaevich Kashin and the United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
In its September 6, 2012 decision in the matter Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
And there in the heart of Berlin, mere yards from the din of Unter den Linden, the courtyard of the old Prussian State Library beckons. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:09 pm
The case of Ram Lakhan v State 137 (2007) DLT 173 on begging is a lesson in stupid laws and sensitive adjudication. [read post]
17 May 2014, 4:37 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:57 am
 Directive 98/34 requires in fact Member States to notify the European Commission of any  “technical regulations” that they intend to adopt. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:38 am
The court explains that victims can receive assistance from the government to learn about additional assets a foreign government may own in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, partner, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC.Note: The author's colleagues represent the defendant-appellant. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]