Search for: "State v. Bitting"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 2:31 pm
The internetdefamationlawblog, describing State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:35 am
Some lawyers maintain that it is always to the advantage of the plaintiff to litigate a claim in federal court for the following reasons. * The Federal Rules of Evidence typically are a bit more lenient, and therefore more favorable to a plaintiff than are the state rules of evidence. * The federal courtrooms are much grander and larger than the typical state courtrooms, and therefore juries are likely to be more impressed with a case brought in federal court and more… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:18 pm
Some lawyers maintain that it is always to the advantage of the plaintiff to litigate a claim in federal court for the following reasons. * The Federal Rules of Evidence typically are a bit more lenient, and therefore more favorable to a plaintiff than are the state rules of evidence. * The federal courtrooms are much grander and larger than the typical state courtrooms, and therefore juries are likely to be more impressed with a case brought in federal court and more… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States every bit as much as I lack standing that decision. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
But from the perspective of a disabled Hawaii student trying to get a GED, doing so just became a bit more feasible. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:39 am
Nancy Urizar: Supreme Court Of The United States To Hear Oral Arguments In Patent Exhaustion Case Andy Lucas & Robyn Chatwood: Intellectual Property Rights In A Virtual World Deanna Okun: US Must Bolster Fight With China Over Intellectual Property Rights Matthew Humphries: Sony Patent Wants Every Gadget To Double As A Wireless Charger Evan Engstrom: In Apple v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am
I’ve been away from case summaries for a bit. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:56 pm
Cotton is a bit hard to reconcile with the Court's other recent opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Aniruddha Rajput, AES Summit Generation Limited and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Hungary: The Scope of ad hoc Committee Review for Manifest Excess of Powers and Failure to State Reasons Borzu Sabahi & Kabir Duggal, Occidental Petroleum v Ecuador (2012): Observations on Proportionality, Assessment of Damages and Contributory Fault Andrea Marco Steingruber, Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi: Consent and Arbitral Tribunal Competence to Hear… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As stated in Lavigne v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:05 pm
Contents include:Legal Problems of Intra-EU BITsMarc Bungenberg & August Reinisch, IntroductionPanos Koutrakos, The Relevance of EU Law for Arbitral Tribunals: (Not) Managing the Lingering Tension Mavluda Sattorova, Investor Rights under EU Law and International Investment Law Martins Paparinskis, Investors’ Remedies under EU Law and International Investment Law Hanno Wehland, The Enforcement of Intra-EU BIT Awards: Micula v Romania and Beyond Christina Binder, A… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:53 am
Do laws that constrain state agents on state territory also apply abroad? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
[LINK] JOAO Control & Monitoring v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
So if $600 gets garnished from your monthly Social Security check to pay your IRS debt, that $600 still counts as part of your monthly income to determine what welfare programs for which you might or might not be eligible.Now, Legal Aid has a point; that's somewhat silly, because you're still poor, since you don't actually get the $600, so it seems a bit crazy to say that you're not poor because "in theory" you get an extra $600 a month (that you actually… [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
We have been writing a bit about the competitive threat about to be unleashed on Starbucks as McDonalds inserts baristas in its 14,000 resturants in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 1:50 pm
Board of Education (SCOTUS, 1947) Lemon v. [read post]
