Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 121 - 140
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
Goldstein v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am
Blight, Spencer P. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
Supreme Court decided Kelo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am
**The bill includes the following: (6) In Bearden v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:10 am
New York State Urban Development Corporation, which approved of Manhattanville’s condemnation, and also the political rhetoric and blight reports that justified the taking. [read post]
Speech at University of Mississippi School of Law on Eminent Domain Referendum Initiative Measure 31
6 Oct 2011, 12:07 pm
But that is much more restrictive than the state’s current blight law. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Auth. v.] [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm
It adopts criteria that are consistent with the meaning of the term “blight” under the State Constitution, according to the New Jersey Supreme Court decision in Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:38 am
’” The Commonwealth Court noted that the US Supreme Court in “Kelo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:52 am
Justice Brooke in Tomlyn v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:22 pm
See State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm
Supreme Court’s controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:15 pm
Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
In the years after Berman v. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] Economist Edward Glaeser reviews my book “The Grasping Hand” in the Wall Street Journal
26 Jul 2015, 12:43 pm
For example, banning “economic development” takings may not do much good if “blight” condemnations are still permitted, and blight is defined so broadly that virtually any area qualifies. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]
