Search for: "State v. Bolds"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 7:38 am
MacNaughton v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Unfortunately, these days many employment contract termination (and other) provisions have a Waksdale problem and are invalid or at least open to challenge in the wake of Waksdale v Swegon North America 2020 ONCA 391. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
(emphasis added; unless otherwise indicated, bolded text throughout this essay signifies the same). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
V. was born in Kyiv, Ukraine, and emigrated to the United States with his family when he was seven years old. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 4:29 am
A civil rights lawsuit pending in New York in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Upsolve v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:22 am
The European Court of Human Rights acknowledged this in the Case of A & B v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
"Which is pretty darn bold. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm
” (Lester v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
”Four years later, in Gregg v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:13 pm
Lite-Netics LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 7:59 am
In fact, the option form emphasized in bold lettering that he could select a different kind of coverage simply by making a phone call—but he never did. [read post]
