Search for: "State v. Boots" Results 121 - 140 of 851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2018, 11:15 am by J. Ross Pepper
Here are some helpful cases from other states which I believe a Tennessee court would find persuasive and might follow: Wardley Development, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
  That'll boot the case back to the Ninth Circuit, and potentially result in some additional delay. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477, 484 (1989)) (alteration marks omitted); see also State Oil Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
In Oregon, at least on Trimet, speak softly and carry a big message.The case referred to in the Thursday, April 24, 2008, Oregonian story by John Snell:"TriMet: You shout, you're out: New rules - It's not what you say, but how loudly you say it, that will get you booted off the public transit system," can be found at the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) Opinions webpage.The case is: STATE OF OREGON v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
 It's at least sufficiently close to make deference to the people with boots on the ground appropriate. [read post]