Search for: "State v. C. D." Results 121 - 140 of 13,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 3:41 am by sally
Registration of the earlier trade mark in the member state concerned did not constitute a prerequisite for the running of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence prescribed in article 9(1).” (Case C-482/09); [2011] WLR (D) 279 WLR Daily, 22nd September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Specifically, CAA § 301(d)(1)(A) provides that EPA “is authorized to treat Indian tribes as states under this chapter” and § 301(d)(2) asserts that EPA “shall promulgate regulations … specifying those provisions for which it is appropriate to treat Indian tribes as States,” under the conditions enumerated in § 301(d)(2)(A)-(C) (emphases added). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:24 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mich.): Complaint State Motion PI State Brief PI State Brief PI Ex A Compact State Brief PI Ex B Resolution State Brief PI Ex C CDA State Brief PI Ex D Letter State Brief PI Ex E Web page State Brief PI Ex F Gaming Ordinance [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2013-08-26 Defendant State_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (3) Affirmation in Support of State Defendant_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (2) Exhibit A – Amended Answer and Counterclaim (3) Exhibit B – letters from Banks (3) Exhibit C – 2012-05-24 Statement by Counsel (3) Exhibit D 2013-07-11 Chief_s Correspondence to FERC (2) US intervention materials here. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]