Search for: "State v. Catchings" Results 121 - 140 of 3,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 4:33 am by stu@crimapp.com
Previously, in People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 649 NW2d 123 (2002), the Court stated that in catch-all cases, a Court was required to look at the specific facts of a given case to determine whether the Defendant’s conduct fell within the catch-all. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:05 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Hopefully 2014 will be the year Congress catches up to the states. [read post]
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Rees decision, in which it upheld the legality of the method of capital punishment used by most states. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:50 am
Arar v Ashcroft is an example of this last category (although the court found that a Bivens action was not available because of state secrets considerations rather than directly under the state secrets doctrine). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:00 pm
This Article offers evidence of this activity from fertility markets based on an empirical study of virtually every fertility clinics' website in the United States and on interviews with key market participants. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm by LindaMBeale
  The Ninth Circuit found a Catch-22 for secret account holders in a case,  In re Grand Jury Investigation M.H. v. [read post]