Search for: "State v. Christine" Results 121 - 140 of 790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
The annual regulatory plan, also released in December 2021, reiterated the list of practices that could be targeted for competition rules, prompting a dissent from Commissioner Christine S. [read post]
During the Federal Trade Commission’s April 28 open meeting, Commissioners utilized the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
The move was announced by Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht during a meeting of defense leaders from dozens of NATO and non-NATO countries at the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 am by Kory A. Crichton
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division answered this question on April 11, 2022 in Christine Ann Devers v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm by David Kopel
Shapiro wrote: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]