Search for: "State v. City of Nashville" Results 121 - 140 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliationOctober 8, 2008 Argument Transcript hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSWIKI hereNoted here: HR Hero14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliation* October 8, 2008 Argument Transcript here* SCOTUSWIKI here* LIIBULLETIN here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
 Next Wednesday, October 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Crawford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Fletcher    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0588n.06 Virga Carter v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 4:38 pm
City of Oak Park    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0453n.06  USA v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Nashville 08a0266p.062008/07/25 B & H Med v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Johnson    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0280n.06 Fritz v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Franklin    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0265n.06 Seales v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Swift    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0231n.06 USA v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
Burns    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0115p.062008/03/19 Noe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]