Search for: "State v. Coca"
Results 121 - 140
of 531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm
Prime riflessioni) Carlos Manuel Díez Soto, Algunas cuestiones a propósito del derecho de participación del autor de una obra de arte original sobre el precio de reventa (droit de suite) (Some questions concerning the artist’s resale right (droit de suite) Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España con arreglo al Derecho Internacional y Europeo de los derechos humanos (Protection of undocumented migrant persons in… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:50 am
United States, the case was about immunity granted to witnesses in a criminal trial. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
In 1999 Schweppes sold the rights to the name to the Coca-Cola Company in 13 EU Member States (including the UK), keeping their rights in 18 other countries in the EU, among which was Spain. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
Similarly, cocaine is derived from the coca leaf (not to be confused with “cocoa” – the source of chocolate). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
And courts and the USPTO have occasionally applied public use doctrine to find that the widespread use of a mark by the public, like “Coke” for Coca-Cola, “Mac” for Macintosh computers, or “the Evil Empire” for the Yankees, can give rise to protectable trademark rights or at least provide adequate foundation to prevent a competitor from making use of a confusingly similar term. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
The Paris Criminal Court of Appeal awarded a total amount of 13 million euros and 12 months’ imprisonment in the case of D.M. v APP, Microsoft, Sacem and others, available in French language here.Monday Miscellany and Sunday SurprisesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 158 [week ending Sunday 30 July] The right of communication to the public ... in a chart I From Coca-Cola Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar: big deal or no deal? [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
In 1881, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Egbert v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
From Coca-Cola Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar: big deal or no deal? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm
The Coca-Cola brand is a trademark. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:16 pm
The Coca-Cola brand is a trademark. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:11 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court had to determine the ordinary meaning of the phrase “carries a firearm. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
” That was enough to show standing, as required by Spokeo v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:11 am
In a previous position, she filed an amicus brief for the Coca-Cola Company and Archer Daniels Midland Company in support of the corporate respondents in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
He later admitted that he had beer in a Coca Cola cup. [read post]
