Search for: "State v. Community Distributors, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2017, 7:02 am by Karel Frielink
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
For example, our Advertising and Marketing Law casebook covers the FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:35 am by Jani Ihalainen
Copyright did not extend to news articles per say, but a different transient property right.Justice Putney ultimately concluded that International News Services had unlawfully acquired the Associated Press' property, and restricted the publication of news by them appropriated from the Associated Press for a number of hours after its publication, unless proper credit was given.The current state of 'hot news' and its protection is uncertain, with subsequent cases such… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
”  [14][1]          United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
The question of injunctions over search results came to ahead in British Columbia, Canada, nearly two years ago, in a case that will be ultimately decided on by the Supreme Court of Canada in the near future.The case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack dealt with Equustek Solutions' technology that allows for industrial equipment made by two separate manufacturers to communicate with each other in a variety of ways. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
  Just look at the FDA’s “reference 5” − Defendant’s [FDA’s] Memorandum of Points & Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss or Summary Judgment, Allergan Inc., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The defence counsel’s major argument was that Google Inc. is not a publisher, as no human input or operation is required in the search process, but is rather a mere passive medium of communication. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
  Yes, said the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Multi Time Machine, Inc., v Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Services, LLC (No.2:11-cv-09076-DDP-MAN, here) when it reversed the District Court’s summary judgment order in Amazon’s favour. [read post]