Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 121 - 140 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 272–73 (4th Cir. 2014) (same); Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm by Unknown
Similarly, Amazon argued it was not involved in sourcing the subject battery from the manufacturer or upstream distributor. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am by Paul Rosenzweig
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am by James Williams
U.S. copyright law exists to protect the interests of content creators by establishing them as the sole owners and distributors of original works of authorship such as books, websites, and videos. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Instead, the second interim rule aims to reduce the burden on the contracting community by allowing an offeror to represent annually through the System for Award Management (SAM), via SAM.gov, whether it provides covered telecommunications equipment or services. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
If so, how clear must they be about that exercise of state power – or how much can they conceal the state’s role by relying on platforms to prohibit “harmful” content” under Terms of Service? [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm by Daphne Keller
If so, how clear must they be about that exercise of state power – or how much can they conceal the state’s role by relying on platforms to prohibit “harmful” content” under Terms of Service? [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
That led Congress to enact the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which tried to limit online porn; but the Court struck that down in Reno v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts Australia Darwin v Norman [2020] NSWSC 357, Fagan J awarded two men who were part of a commune AUS$200,000 damages for libel against a blogger. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm by Chris Castle
Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice to Distributor if the Force Majeure Event affecting Distributor is not prevalent throughout the recording industry in the United States and continues for one hundred and eighty (180) days. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]