Search for: "State v. Concepcion" Results 121 - 140 of 1,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Concepcion that held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that bar the use of class action waivers in consumer arbitration agreements. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Gogo and says it has been cited favorably by federal and state trial courts. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
In October, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the consolidated cases of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Wystan Ackerman
Concepcion, the savings clause does not apply to the fundamental aspects of arbitration. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Wystan Ackerman
Concepcion, the savings clause does not apply to the fundamental aspects of arbitration. [read post]
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333, 339 (Concepcion)). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:56 am by John Lewis
” The DOJ brief concluded, “Just as the savings clause was held not to encompass the state-law rule at issue in Concepcion, it does not encompass the analogous federal-law rule that the Seventh and Ninth Circuits derived from the NLRA. [read post]