Search for: "State v. Cornell"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 7:45 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a "violent felony" requires the use of physical force. [read post]
25 Feb 2004, 11:28 am
The case is Locke v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder] that, in construing a federal statute imposing mandatory minimum sentences for drug trafficking crimes committed with guns, the minimum sentence contained in the statute applies unless another statute imposes a longer minimum sentence for the weapons charge. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
The Court ruled 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
United States, arguing that DOMA violates the Equal Protection Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder] by precluding... [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:16 am
[JURIST] Oral arguments began Monday in South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:16 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that time granted to prepare pretrial motions is not automatically excludable under the Speedy Trial Act [18 USC § 3161(h)(1) text]. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:12 am
In US v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:21 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a federal "aggravated identity theft" statute [18 USC § 1028A(a)(1)] applies only to individuals who knowingly use another person's identification documents. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:41 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder] that under a federal witness tampering statute [18 USC § 1512(a)(1)(C) text] the government must show there was a reasonable likelihood the witness would communicate relevant information to federal officers. [read post]
1 Jun 2004, 3:10 am
The case is Yarborough v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
In MBZ v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:16 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:06 am
Pinholster [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that review under the federal habeas law is limited to the record that was before the state court, reinstating the death penalty for a convicted man. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm
Duke [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] with the state court narrowing their claims to California stores, Judge Charles Breyer informed the plaintiffs that he was not able to see... [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:15 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-1 in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a federal sentencing court must determine whether "an offense under State law" is a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) [18 USC § 924] by consulting the "maximum term of imprisonment" applicable to a defendant's prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant's conviction for that offense.... [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:41 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Monday in Comptroller v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:19 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm
Plata [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] to uphold an order requiring California to release up to 46,000 prisoners to remedy the state's overcrowded prisons [JURIST news archive]. [read post]
