Search for: "State v. Corrigan"
Results 121 - 140
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2017, 3:02 am
Lawyers with contingency-fee role in AGs’ carbon campaign join Hagens Berman [Scott Flaherty, American Lawyer; earlier on climate lawyers on contingency fee here and here] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, 2008, includes entries on urban planning by Mark Pennington and on eminent domain and takings by Karol Boudreaux; California legislature’s $1.5 billion green Christmas tree includes bill “aimed at helping a union looking to organize workers who assemble Tesla electric cars in… [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 12:15 pm
A Golfer has No Duty to Protect Another Player From Ordinary NegligenceShin v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
Justice Corrigan declined to participate in the decision based on her previously stated objections to the Court’s new disqualification rule. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 2:17 am
Appellate criminal defense practitioners should note Justice Corrigan’s concurrence in People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:38 am
In Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
"In Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
Calderon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
State of Michigan, Case Nos. 139345-47. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:31 am
Citing Corrigan v Joseph, 304 NY 172, 185 [1952], cert denied 345 US 924, the Appellate Division dismissed the City’s appeal, ruling that the City had promulgated the rules in question without complying with the procedures mandated by Civil Service Law §20 as they had been adopted without notice, without a public hearing, and without approval by the State Civil Service Commission [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:44 pm
Corrigan of Lubing & Corrigan, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming; Mikel L. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
They have succeeded,” Corrigan wrote. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:41 am
ee People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 7:53 am
Chief Justice George and Justices Chin and Moreno concurred.Justice Corrigan dissented. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm
Justice Baxter dissented, joined by Justices Chin and Corrigan: "I cannot join the majority's continuing effort to limit and restrict the terms of private arbitration agreements, which enjoy special protection under both state and federal law." [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:15 am
The Irish caselaw on this point is an ex tempore decision, EMI v Eircom. [read post]
