Search for: "State v. Crown" Results 121 - 140 of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am by Blog Editorial
The respondent Secretary of State argued that Parliament could choose to leave prerogative power in the hands of the Crown, even if its use would result in a change to common law and statutory rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In discussing the Crown’s delay, the Court cites the SCC in R. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:51 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed an appeal from the Crown questioning a judge’s decision not to impose a fine on a fraudster who bilked Canada Customs of more than $4.7 million because she believed he wouldn’t pay it.In R. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:04 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB) (21 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Mhango, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1321 (Admin) (10 June 2010) Am, R (on the application of) v The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2010] EWHC 1228 (Admin) (28 May 2010) The Law Society of England and Wales, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor [2010]… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The Secretary of State argued that by “necessary implication” the statutory scheme could not exclude the Crown’s common law right to recover benefits overpaid by mistake of fact or law. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In discussing the Crown’s delay, the Court cites the SCC in R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:36 am
" The state appeals court states that the Lake Superior Court erred when it found that the general zoning statute governing counties did not apply to municipalities like Crown Point. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Current Issue: Volume 9, Issue 1 (2020) Articles PDF ANOTHER INAPPROPRIATE F WORD: FIDUCIARY DOCTRINE AND THE CROWN-INDIGENOUS RELATIONSHIP IN CANADABryan Birtles PDF “ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE”: NAVAJO NATION V. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:41 pm by Injury at Sea
The fisherman was safely rescued by a nearby good Samaritan, the fishing vessel Crown Royal. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This is because a Crown act of state is a prerogative act of policy in the field of international affairs, and the rules under the doctrine provide the Government with a a defence to a claim arising from acts of state committed abroad which are otherwise suitable for adjudication by a court. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
A must-read decision today from the Ninth Circuit -- Crown Point Development, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Similar issues are playing out now in the United States, where the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In relation to sentencing in the Crown Court, there was some Court of Appeal authority on sentencing which arose from riots in Bradford, West Yorkshire back in 2001 – see R v Chapman 2002 and R v Najeeb 2003. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]