Search for: "State v. D. A. R." Results 121 - 140 of 16,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by J
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:59 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) D, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1485 (29 June 2010) Budimir & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1486 (29 June 2010) Harvey, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1317 (19 May 2010) Mortimer, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1303 (25 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JN (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 723 (29 June 2010) Fiddes v Channel… [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm by Logan Murr
On August 31, at the request of Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USTPO) provided a report to Congress analyzing infringement disputes between patent and trademark rights holders and states and state entities. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:00 am by sally
Regina (Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [On appeal from Regina (SK (Zimbabwe)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department] [2011] UKSC 23; [2011] WLR (D) 175 “In addition to complying with the statutory requirements for detaining a foreign national who was awaiting deportation from the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State was also required to comply with the published Home Office policy relating to the detention… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Thеrе are оnlу fіftу GS-13-ranked іndіvіduаlѕ іn the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:20 am by sally
PR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SS (Bangladesh) v Same; TC (Zimbabwe) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 988; [2011] WLR (D) 276 “The two tiers of the tribunal system operating in respect of immigration and asylum cases were, and were plainly to be regarded as, competent to determine whether there was a compelling reason why the particular issue on which an applicant’s claim which had failed twice before that system should be… [read post]