Search for: "State v. D. A. R." Results 121 - 140 of 16,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Cunningham (Georgia State University College of Law) & Ute Römer-Barron (Georgia State University) has posted Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
Missouri On January 31, 2024, Missouri state Representative Mitch Boggs (R-157) introduced H.B. 2603, the “Caller ID Anti-Spoofing Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
There is therefore a “disagreement which affects the result” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(d) If the notice is faulty in any way, the court can use any error in the notice as a reason to deny relocation and even punish the would-be-relocator with a sanction. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  It also requires consideration of the conventional wisdom about who benefits from litigating in federal court and how that informs litigation strategy, as well as very recent legislative initiatives aimed at unveiling the beneficial owners of LLCs.Federal v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]