Search for: "State v. D. L."
Results 121 - 140
of 7,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
(Texas)Matthew L. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
(Texas)Matthew L. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:55 pm
., United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:09 pm
In Viacom Int'l, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Sloss, Michael D. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:12 pm
Teleflex, Inc. - Tom BrodyA Correlation Between the State of the US Economy and Patent Litigation Activity - Bradley D. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
L'Oreal argued that this rule was not adopted by the UK Supreme Court.Readers may recall that Lord Neuberger's judgment in Actavis v Lilly stated that just because anti-folates were referred to generally and the claims were limited to pemetrexed disodium, in particular, this did not mean that the patent was intending that other pemetrexed compounds would not infringe. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:17 am
Arthur-Price v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
" So began the judgment of Lord Justice Ward in D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684.The facts: When the child L (I'm not sure why, not for the first time, the initial referring to the child in the judgment differs from the initial used in the citation) was 6 weeks old he suffered a fracture of the mid-shaft of his left humerus, fractures of his ribs on both his left and right side and a fracture of the left tibia. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
By Mark D. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:19 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
D.L. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
Georges Decocq, Sur les sentences déclaratoires Antonio Crivellaro, The Failure to State Reasons in ICSID Awards [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Par exemple, dans une procédure où le demandeur soutenait que des chaussures lui avaient causé un préjudice corporel, la cour a accepté comme défendeur un magazine très connu qui avait fait l'éloge de ces chaussures dans l'un de ses articles. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
L. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
Ch. 1952), aff’d, 91 A.2d 137 (Del. 1952) (which eventually became part of Brown v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
France, the Fédération de l'organisation économique fruits et légumes (Fedecom) and Producteurs de légumes de France had brought actions seeking the annulment of that decision before the General Court, alleging inter alia an error of law in that the Commission categorised measures financed by voluntary contributions from the sector concerned as State aid within the meaning of Art. 107(1) EC. [read post]
