Search for: "State v. Dickerson" Results 121 - 140 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  To take just four of the most recent, high-profile examples: – In Dickerson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Criminal Procedure In her book, Kwall discusses the American constitutional case of Dickerson v. [read post]
He states that a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team,” a “senior [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
In 1825 Senator Dickerson firmly resisted colonialism in opposing a proposal to erect military fortifications and extend U.S. revenue laws there:"As yet, we have extended our laws to no territories, but such as were or are to become states of the Union. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Tyler Moore
Within its analysis, the BRB differentiated Gavranovic from Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
New York State Division of Parole KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Officer Directed to Appear for Futher EBT on Issue Of Disciplinary, Civilian Complaint Records Butler v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:34 am by SHG
Justice Kennedy writing for a plurality, has basically blessed the change, specifically stating in a 1991 decision, Gentile v State Bar of Nevada, that: An attorney’s duties do not begin inside the courtroom door. [read post]