Search for: "State v. Donald L. Long" Results 121 - 140 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
Indeed, and slowly at first, the governance techniques of business and the state, especially in the management of economic behaviors, suggested an increasingly important space for systems of discretionary decision-making built on data-algorithm-consequence models as long as these were deployed to further the command of law and the public policies of which law was an expression.[16] It was management that counted, perhaps more than law, and institutions that served principle through… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Bill Marler
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand On 15 February 2019 a judgment was handed down in the long running case of Bloomfield v Slater [2019] NZHC 171 – making public a previous interlocutory judgment in the “Whale Oil” blogger case. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:31 am by Victoria Clark
Donald Trump had announced his candidacy only three months before. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
Because fashion shows were recognized as full-fledged copyright works (‘oeuvres de l’esprit’) under French law by the Civil Supreme Court (Court de Cassation) in 2008 (decision: Ashby v Gaulme, Kenzo et Lacroix (2008) ; Ashby Donald and Others v France [2013] ECHR 28; see here). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
This recommendation has led some, including Caroline Fredrickson and Norman L. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
If the chaos of the first travel ban could have been attributed, at least partly, to rookie error, that excuse is long gone. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Hawaii, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold President Donald Trump’s order restricting entry into the United States by nationals of seven countries, most of which have majority-Muslim populations. [read post]