Search for: "State v. Dyson"
Results 121 - 140
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Justice Dyson queries whether the second letter was confirming that request had been refused. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
Starting on Monday 2 July 2012 in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and anor v Yunus Rahmatullah in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Dyson, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Lord Dyson did not find these reasons persuasive [155-159]. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Starting this morning in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Dyson). [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
The case was heard in April by the Supreme Court Justices Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
Starting on Tuesday 24 April 2012 are the linked appeals of R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, which are listed for three days to be heard by a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Clarke, L Dyson and L Wilson). [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
The bench throughout is Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Dyson and Sumption. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Another interesting link features the Daily Mail in the late 1960s: blogger Jack Dyson has reproduced a memo from editor Mike Randall to all staff, concerning journalists’ ethical behaviour. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
JD (Congo) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327 The Court of Appeal has considered the test for the second stage of appeal in immigration cases, when someone wishes to appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
