Search for: "State v. Eady"
Results 121 - 140
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
In CC v AB [2007] EMLR 11, a case where the cuckolded husband was seeking to publish details of a relationship between his wife and the other man, it was argued that an adulterer simply had no rights under Article 8 and Eady J said this at paragraphs 24 and 25: “24. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:50 pm
This recommendation was not adopted, although some years later in Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB); [2003] EMLR 33 Eady J ruled that the publication at issue – an article in a journal called Intelligence and National Security, “a specialist publication with a specialist readership who subscribe to it”, with about 146 subscribers in the UK – attracted qualified privilege at common law because it consisted of a “specialist… [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft KCMG v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Cook v Telegraph Media Ltd, heard 9 June 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
” Alex Spence at Buzzfeed has uncovered the fact that the Telegraph hired Sir David Eady, who they described as “the judge who stops us from knowing the truth,” to conduct a secret internal inquiry. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
” Last week in the Courts On 2 February 2016 Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
It may have been these factors which led Mr Eadie to state during the hearing in these proceedings that the position would be kept under review, as the Lord Chancellor had undertaken in the Unison case. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Privacy spotlighted This issue was not long untouched by the courts- in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20 the judge Eady J. provided useful guidance to assist in the application of Campbell’s second limb. [read post]
10 May 2009, 2:58 pm
This suggestion was made in the context of a public figure in the Mosley v News Group case (UK, 2008) that I blogged about over at The Faculty Lounge recently. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
Mr Justice Eady quoted Munby J in Sulamain v Jaffali [2001] EWHC 556 (Fam) “Religion… is not the business of government or of the secular courts. [read post]
