Search for: "State v. English" Results 121 - 140 of 7,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
This was to prevent individuals of English descent, residing in colonial territories for long periods, from solely accessing English law while also enabling others to access this law. 2. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"53 A study of the Corpus of Founding Era American English (COFEA) supports our position.54 The phrase "Officers of the United States" had no apparent "specialized meaning attached to its use. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Part of the GGC’s stated vision during the election was support for “evidence-based” governance. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
This is a view that has been endorsed by English judges in Lawlor (at para 3) and Aquavita International SA v Ashapura Minecham Ltd [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) [20], citing inter alia, older editions of Plender and Wilderpin. [read post]