Search for: "State v. Fees"
Results 121 - 140
of 20,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 3:03 pm
Supply Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
Ordinarily, a retainer agreement should state whether the fee covers appellate work. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
ShareThe justices took the easy and simple path in Siegel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:17 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:22 am
Nevertheless, there were post-discharge work and fees, and this dispute in state court followed. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
It is styled, Joe Ware v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:25 am
Another state Attorney General joins in the Resort Fee litigation – this time suing Hilton On July 23, 2019, Attorney General Doug Patterson filed a lawsuit against Hilton, alleging that it has engaged in deceptive and misleading pricing practices and failure to disclose fees in violation of Nebraska’s consumer protection laws. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:21 am
Bywaters v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
The second DCA stated that her conduct was not enough to justify the award of attorney fees. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:17 pm
Here are the materials: Pakootas Brief State of Washington Brief Teck Cominco Brief CA9 Unpublished Opinion The attorney fees award, I believe, is discussed here. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Cottrill v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
As stated by the court in Nottingdale, agreements to pay attorney fees in a "contract of adhesion, where the party with little or no bargaining power has no realistic choice as to terms," are not enforceable. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 9:35 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
The attorneys' fees-only lawsuit is permissible.The case is Ballard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
A recent Federal Circuit case, Haggart v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Under both state and federal law, the c [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 7:58 am
The court held that the 18% fee was interest, not merely a fee, stating Kentucky’s rule that “[t]he transaction’s substance, not its legal form, is key. [read post]
