Search for: "State v. First Judicial Dist."
Results 121 - 140
of 1,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
Dist. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
The rationale for this position was first expressed in Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
Dist. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
Silva, 413 NE 2d 139 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1980 Perhaps judicial notice could be taken that a different woman is not the other mother of a child. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962), and Sch Dist Abington Twnshp v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
This one is on why some courts view pseudonymity as burdening the judicial process; I'll have more soon on reasons that support pseudonymity. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 3:57 am
appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
Palo Alto Unified School Dist. (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 871, 880-881.) [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 2:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]