Search for: "State v. Going Places Travel Corporation"
Results 121 - 140
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm
“[T]he vast, vast majority of political speech and speech on public issues that occurs in this country is corporate speech,” Alito stated. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm
[iii] One driver may be the state of the economy in the United States today. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:33 pm
/U.K. countries, “98 percent of … business leaders are not confident their organization can monitor all devices and users at all times, which means information is traveling through unknown places,” and some “91 percent of board members [of these] respondent companies are unable to interpret a cybersecurity report. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am
In Brookfield Communications, Inc v West Coast Entertainment Corporation metatags were seen as infringing a registered trademark (constituting a use of the mark), even though the tags are not communicated to the public as a part of the website. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
The simple result of my intellectual travels is that I must, at several ports, rely entirely upon my own resources. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
I was going to just bankrupt it all and go look for work, but a [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Under the new Washington law, sharing may take place at a corporate target range, but not on one’s property. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
As they had done the previous year, the Bible Believers traveled to the Festival so that they could exercise their sincerely held religious beliefs. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
One of the justifications for a local final appellate court was that it would enhance access to justice as litigants would not have to bear the costs of travel to the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Here’s your chance to know all the relevant IP places of the blogosphere and to get to know the new guest and resident kats.* No go for GO: Skechers scupper trade mark applicationsIn the next few weeks, Jeremy will be posting on a number of cases that are still of interest though they are no longer "hot news", these being decisions on which was unable to comment at the time they were published since he was up to his whiskers in conferencing and… [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am
Harding, referring to the Founders in the 1920s became a way justifying his rejection of two decades of progressive change.JB: By the way, around the turn of the twentieth century, the corporate bar begins to defend the idea of judicial review strongly and Marbury v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:03 pm
Reports place the train traveling at possibly as fast as 100 miles per hour; nearly twice the speed it should have been travelling. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In Sheraton Corporation of America v Sheraton Motels Ltd [1964] RPC 202, the US hotel chain had an arguable case to justify an interlocutory injunction against use of its mark; the goodwill was based on the fact that customers living in the United Kingdom booked rooms in the plaintiff’s hotels through the plaintiff’s London office or through UK-based travel agents. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Is the Internet a tool you use or a place you go? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
As such, it belongs to juridical persons accused of infringement (people, corporations, etc.), not the good itself.[14] Although we might talk in shorthand about the patented good traveling in commerce unencumbered by patent rights, a patent grants to its owner the right to exclude others (people, corporations, etc.) from infringing the patent. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
It's the height of betrayal of the public, and it could conceivably be taking place with the help even of some companies that are loudly complaining about government spying. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
None of that really matters.The Hartford is doing what a big corporation is going to do in its own interests. [read post]
