Search for: "State v. Gray" Results 121 - 140 of 1,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Public employer may be liable for damages suffered as a result of negligent supervision and negligent retention of its employees Gray v Schenectady City School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 05925, Appellate Division, Third Department One of the defendant in this action, Steven Raucci, was employed by the Schenectady City School District) as its director of facilities. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 3:15 pm by Injury at Sea
The men safely boarded a Coast Guard Station Grays Harbor 52-foot motor life boat and were transported by the crew to Grays Harbor. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, will argue for the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:42 pm by Dwight Sullivan
When I crunched the Silver CAAF Tongue Award numbers, I overlooked the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm by Jed
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari review of Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
"  The canon in question was applied by the Chief Justice, on behalf of six Justices, in last year's Bond decision--namely, the “the well-established principle” of Gregory v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm by Injury at Sea
The crew of the 74-foot fishing vessel Privateer called Station Grays Harbor watchstanders via VHF radio channel 16 at 2:26 p.m., stating they were taking on water through an 8-to-12-inch hole and preparing to abandon ship by deploying their life raft and donning immersion suits. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:07 pm
On July 28, 2008, the President approved the death sentence in the case of the United States v Ronald A. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
In other words, legally made works can be bought and sold and resold on the “grey” (or “gray” for those not in the Commonwealth) market, according to common sense. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:31 pm by Athena Boyer
Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]