Search for: "State v. Handy"
Results 121 - 140
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
The State alleged that this further search revealed 38,000 additional names and identifying information.Minassian v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:07 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Subchapter V Decision Tracker Watch and learn from our collection of 750 videos, gathered conveniently in the new Practice Videos Resource Kit . [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
This new law would appear to include independent contractors operating on their own who provide services to on-demand companies or their customers in the gig economy, such as Uber, Lyft, InstaCart, Postmates, GrubHub, TaskRabbit, and Handy. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
Kennard v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:04 am
Handy v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 8:36 am
Ed. 2d 130 (1996); Watson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
It’s cited in Douglas Baird’s chapter in Intellectual Property Stories on International News Service v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:19 pm
For courts and legislatures interested in anticipating this development in Apprendi law, or interested in joining the states that already recognize that a prior conviction must be proven like any other element whenever it increases the penalty range beyond the range allowed without the conviction, this essay provides a handy reference to existing rules and statutes that could serve as blueprints for reform. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 8:31 pm
For courts and legislatures interested in anticipating this development in Apprendi law, or interested in joining the states that already recognize that a prior conviction must be proven like any other element whenever it increases the penalty range beyond the range allowed without the conviction, this essay provides a handy reference to existing rules and statutes that could serve as blueprints for reform. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:08 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
” The case, Polley v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:01 am
The question in Rock River Minerals, LP and Carr v. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:19 am
Hunter’s Lessee (14 U.S. 304) and United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
