Search for: "State v. Jihad"
Results 121 - 140
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Greater Boston Television Corp. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative,… [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:25 am
See, e.g., Ridley v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
The state officially took the first step in implementing the new law on February 1, 2004 by assigning the first President of a new establishment named the Iran Space Agency (ISA). [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am
Tomorrow, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Europe's top human rights court based in Strasbourg, France, will hear arguments in El-Masri v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm
” — this might qualify as either incitement of imminent criminal conduct, or as constitutionally unprotected solicitation of crime (see United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:40 am
Supreme Court's decision last year, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
On January 7, 2010, when agents seized defendant’s passports and he realized that he likely would soon be arrested, defendant sought to commit a final act of jihad by crashing his car on the Whitestone Expressway in Queens, hoping to cause a spectacular explosion that would kill others. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:18 am
The Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:23 pm
In 1969, in Brandenburg v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
In 1969, in Brandenburg v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:53 pm
The IJU has been designated by the U.S. secretary of state as a foreign terrorist organization. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
