Search for: "State v. John D. Justice" Results 121 - 140 of 3,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am by Kendall Gray
Clinton, another chief justice named John (Roberts) did his own judicial Judo. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Roberts repeatedly returned to the question of how the justices should apply their 2016 decision in the Texas case, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm by Ronald Mann
United States was a quiet one, with several of the justices saying so little that it is difficult to discern what they are thinking. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:27 am by WSLL
The State of WyomingDocket Number: S-11-0150URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, Honorable John G. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
Justices Needle Counsel in Oral Argument of NFL Licensing Antitrust CaseThis posting was written by John W. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Matt Bodie
 So if states wanted to make you buy health care, or broccoli, or private security, that'd be fine even if the ACA is unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by axd10
Reflections on Justice John Paul Stevens's Concurring Opinion in Baze v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Justice Samuel Alito, along with several jurists from the United Kingdom visiting the United States as part of a legal exchange program, participated in a reenactment of a 1794 Supreme Court case, Georgia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
If the Court reaches the merits, the Justices ought to affirm the district court decision based upon Romer v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
John Yoo gets immunity under Ashcroft v. al-Kidd for the “Torture Memo. [read post]
” Thomas also criticized Sixth Circuit Judge John Bush’s concurrence in the Sixth Circuit decision, because Bush stated Davis was motivated by “anti-homosexual animus. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
John Fund upheld the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance first recognized by the Court in Basic v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
  But such a holding seems to be so potentially wrong that I'm not at all sure that's what Justice McKinster actually means.Part of the opinion seems obviously right. [read post]