Search for: "State v. Jost"
Results 121 - 140
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost observes that although “[t]he atheists and nonbelievers who brought this lawsuit seven years ago were fated to lose once it reached a Supreme Court that has been increasingly uninterested in policing the separation of church and state,” “they might have expected more respectful treatment in oral arguments. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
At his blog Jost on Justice, Ken Jost describes the book as an “affectionate, discursive memoir. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost argues that the Court’s recent decisions in Maples v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
At his Jost on Justice blog, Kenneth Jost looks back what he characterizes as the decline in candor from Supreme Court nominees over time. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
In August, a federal panel of judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the 18 states standing to contest the non-payments in a case called House v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am
Jost on Justice’s Kenneth Jost and TIME’s Adam Cohen discuss retired Justice John Paul Stevens’ New York Review of Books essay on the death penalty (originally covered in Monday’s round-up). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost notes that “the administration is set to open the Supreme Court’s new term next month [in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:35 am
Shown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:41 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on the challenge to North Carolina’s 2013 election laws and suggests that, because the state may be a “critical” one “in the presidential election, the Supreme Court owes the state, and the nation, a decision that is fair not to one side, but to both. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
” Additional commentary comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
A Daily Journal podcast features discussion with Peter Altman about Lucia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
First up is Currier v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
