Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 121 - 140
of 3,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 1:06 am
The first was Karakó v Hungary. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 7:41 pm
Marineau v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Correction is then effected by way of a corrigendum or reprint of the entire specification, see EPC Guidelines C-V 10 (September 2013), last paragraph. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
It is also noted that the above reasoning, which had been communicated as preliminary opinion of the board in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA (cf. point V above), was not contested by any party at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 12:38 pm
T. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Baylor College of Medicine and William K. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
(K-12 schools can also exclude the Confederate flag when it’s likely to cause material disruption, but that’s because the government has more flexibility in its role as K-12 educator, see Tinker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 8:16 pm
In the case of Falzo, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 8:16 pm
In the case of Falzo, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The State argued that the defendants weren't charged with obstruction, but rather the failure to comply with a reasonable request to move to prevent an obstruction. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Hence decision T 1194/97 does not support the conclusion of the ED. 4.1.3 The present board agrees with the finding of T 1194/97 and the statements of the Guidelines cited above. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
The website was a gripe site created by Tim Anders (a/k/a “Dr. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellant’s representative answered on June 23, 2008, stating that he was acting on behalf of Zenon Technology Partnership. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The stripes at issue were five and represented on the side of sport shoes [Case T‑85/13, K-Swiss Inc v OHIM and Künzli SwissSchuh AG].4The dispute concerned the sign in subject of the Community figurative trade mark application No 4771978 (above), which the applicant K-Swiss Inc registered in 2007 with reference to “footwear” in class 25. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 4:22 pm
T 208/84 [5]). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Supreme Court ruled against Intel Corporation in, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:12 am
” Swag Merchandising Inc. et al v. [read post]
