Search for: "State v. King" Results 121 - 140 of 5,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 7:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau: Yakama Opening Brief US Appellee Brief State Amicus Brief Reply Brief Lower court materials in King Mountain Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:14 pm by Joey Fishkin
 This interpretation views King through the lens of the joint dissent in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
The State of Kentucky failed to acknowledge service and Pocket Kings applied for summary judgment. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
 It's almost as though he believes respondents' position even more than they do.Justice Perren analogizes appellant -- the Golden State Water Company -- to a monopolist and to King George III. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:49 am by Adam Zimmerman
She responds to Justice Kennedy's apparent concern at oral argument that threatening the states with the loss of tax credits for their citizens--and the destruction of their individual insurance markets--would be unconstitutionally coercive under the Tenth Amendment: “the states are being told either create your own exchange, or we’ll send your insurance market into a death spiral. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am by Margaret Wood
  Although it is one of Shakespeare’s history plays, it tells of an earlier history than Richard II and III, the Henrys (IV, V and VI). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am by Guest Blogger
Brianne Gorod On October 31, the Supreme Court will consider whether to grant cert. in King v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
King notes that the state trial court held a suppression hearing and announced factual findings, which I have posted here. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” And State Superior Court Strikes Down HB 1287, and PILTs as “Taxes” Here is the court’s order in City of Snoqualmie v. [read post]
In Mabo v Queensland, the court ruled that the Crown’s sovereignty over Australian land could not be challenged in court. [read post]