Search for: "State v. Lack"
Results 121 - 140
of 39,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:29 am
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:03 pm
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
Are we really worried about percentage leases, or fee-sharing with law firm employees leading to lack of professional independence? [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Therefore, in an article 78 proceeding, "as long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board of Trustees, its determination must stand" (Matter of Giuliano v New York Fire Dept. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Therefore, in an article 78 proceeding, "as long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board of Trustees, its determination must stand" (Matter of Giuliano v New York Fire Dept. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Warsame v Hounslow LBC (2000) WLR 696 on s.193(7) considered. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
Fujifilm contested, raising arguments relating to the (lacking) confidential nature of the information and proportionality (i.e. limiting access to 3 employees should be considered disproportionate). [read post]
