Search for: "State v. Lang" Results 121 - 140 of 650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Volume I, Dynamic jurisprudential thought / Charles Mwalimu.Mwalimu, Charles.New York : Peter Lang, c2010.AntitrustKF1649.A2 C49 2009Circuit conflicts in antitrust litigation / John H. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Put in a more elegant way, the Appellate Term decided Garg v Wigler   2012 NY Slip Op 50494(U) Decided on March 20, 2012   Appellate Term, First Department: "Accepting plaintiff's allegations as true, and according them the benefit of every favorable inference, as we must in the context of a motion to dismiss on the pleadings (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we find the complaint, as amplified by plaintiff's verified answers to… [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Lockwood Reexamination Gripe Goes Nowhere As discussed last week, the case of Lockwood v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:30 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
In an unpublished decision rendered on September 14, 2010, (United States v. [read post]