Search for: "State v. Levy" Results 121 - 140 of 2,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2008, 2:46 am
A short piece in Sunday's NY Times mentioned my debate late last year with Robert Levy of the Cato Institute, who is one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff in Heller v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm by Sme
Global Staffing (10th Cir., June 17, 2015) (affirming judgement as a matter of law and jury verdict against Smith on his Title VII, civil rights, and ADA claims)Levy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
(B) Jurisdiction The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction to approve a levy under subparagraph (A) [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:54 am
Yesterday afternoon I debated Robert Levy of the Cato Institute, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs in Heller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
State of Assam[1], where a tax was levied on transport of sugar in the state of Assam. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
State of Assam[1], where a tax was levied on transport of sugar in the state of Assam. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:22 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court held that the transfer of branded software constitutes a sale and is exigible to sales tax, levied by State Governments under Entry 54, Schedule VII of the Constitution (Tata Consultancy Services v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am by Marty Lederman
Attorney General Levi and Solicitor General Bork filed dueling briefs in 1975 in Buckley v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:10 pm by Andrew Hamm
Director, Division of Taxation of New Jersey 21-641Issue: Whether a levy that raises revenue for a state’s general fund, and that is not restricted to the in-state activities of the levy-payor, may be characterized as a locally focused regulatory fee, and thus be imposed without regard to whether it is internally consistent. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am by Paul Levy
by Paul Alan Levy A recent blog post by Aaron Krowne, castigating the rejection of an anti-SLAPP motion filed by his company ML-Implode.com as "bizarre ruling" and "blatant miscarriage of justice," has gained wide circulation on the Internet. [read post]