Search for: "State v. Loftis"
Results 121 - 140
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 3:42 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
I’m very glad education made the bullet list: It’s an area where there is so much discussion about state v. federal control, but it’s cities that make real on-the-ground breakthroughs. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
The Court majority in Printz v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The Guardian also published a lofty manifesto by Nick Clegg (pic) in defence of the draft bill. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm
The Court in Hunter, et al v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm
The Court in Hunter, et al v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
But as an idea it is surely valid, as it works on precisely the federalist, greater than the sum of its parts logic which informs many of the successful modern states and institutions, including the USA, the UN and the EU. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
Given the lofty philosophical pedigree of natural justice (aka procedural fairness) in the common law tradition – and its elevation to the bolstered status of “constitutional justice” within Article 40.3 of the Bunreacht – it seems appropriate to note here the judgment of the High Court today in Callelly v Moylan. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Justice Ginsburg (picture, left) stated"What earthly sense would it make to prefer goods that are manufactured abroad over those manufactured in the United States? [read post]
