Search for: "State v. MacK"
Results 121 - 140
of 289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
It is styled, Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
McCabe & Mack LLP, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kimberly Hunt Lee of counsel), for appellants. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
McCabe & Mack LLP, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kimberly Hunt Lee of counsel), for appellants. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L. v… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
Plaintiff also claimed that authorities cancelled Jewish services during Ramadan to accommodate Muslim prisoners.In Mack v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
The state Supreme Court found that Hall had an IQ of 71. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Circling back to New York Penal Law 155.30(5), in People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Mack v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
See Erwin v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
FEC, NAMUDNO v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Contrary to the complaining dealer’s assertion, the court was not required to instruct the jury that it must accept the dealer’s offering of direct evidence as sufficient and credible to determine that the manufacturer conspired to violate Sec. 1, the appellate court added.The July 7 decision is Toledo Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
An occupational disease is "a disease resulting from the nature of [the] employment and contracted therein" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [15]), and "does not derive from a specific condition peculiar to an employee's place of work, nor from an environmental condition specific to the place of work" (Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d 1252, 1252-1253 [2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Mack v… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
An occupational disease is "a disease resulting from the nature of [the] employment and contracted therein" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [15]), and "does not derive from a specific condition peculiar to an employee's place of work, nor from an environmental condition specific to the place of work" (Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d 1252, 1252-1253 [2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Mack v… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
See Mack Trucks, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Marek v. [read post]
