Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 121 - 140 of 1,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2022, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The amended complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice and the documents submitted do not utterly refute the factual allegations underlying that cause of action (see generally Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 3:03 am by SHG
But Roman Martinez, a lawyer for Mr. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Orin S. Kerr
Martinez indicates through its various opinions that the Miranda violation is complete when a statement is wrongly admitted in violation of Miranda's rules; Dickerson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the complaint a liberal construction, accept all facts as alleged in the complaint to be true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Skagit canoes pulled up onto beach near Coupeville, Whidbey Island Washington, ca. 1895Here are the new materials in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Therefore, at this stage, dismissal was not warranted under CPLR 3211(a)(7), or under CPLR 3211(a)(1), as defendant failed to provide documentary evidence that “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; Amsterdam Hospitality Group, LLC v Marshall-Alan Assoc., Inc., 120 AD3d 431, 432-433 [1st Dept 2014])” [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by NARF
State of Alaska (Indian Child Welfare Act) Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Ramirez: The justice will answer the following: “Whether application of the equitable rule the Supreme Court announced in Martinez v. [read post]