Search for: "State v. Mateo " Results 121 - 140 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 1:39 pm by John Jascob
The court remanded the case to the state court after finding that the federal claims did not constitute a covered class action under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) (Cervantes v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
54 A.D.3d 883 864 N.Y.S.2d 111 2008 NY Slip Op 7024 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The “public concern” test from employment cases is a poor fit for the reasons stated by the dissent. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Mateo Which Was Dumber–Trash-Talking Tweeting, Or The Decision To Prosecute For It? [read post]