Search for: "State v. McCarthy" Results 121 - 140 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
South Cambs relied on a number of Green Belt cases, and then suggested Judge Gilbart QC’s comments in McCarthy v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2006] EWCA (Admin) 3287 set a precedent. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
New York's efforts to punish the National Rifle Association, at issue before the Supreme Court in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
*This distinction proved critical in resolving Cotter v Garden City Union Free School District.James Cotter, a Garden City UFSD teacher designated "Teacher in Charge" of the Regents examination-grading process, became involved in a physical altercation with a fellow teacher, Philip McCarthy. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record/Forbes, earlier on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Emily Dai
Deploying the National Guard is more complicated in D.C. than in the states. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
*This distinction proved critical in resolving Cotter v Garden City Union Free School District.James Cotter, a Garden City UFSD teacher designated "Teacher in Charge" of the Regents examination-grading process, became involved in a physical altercation with a fellow teacher, Philip McCarthy. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm by Elizabeth A. Wilson
Congress intervenes when it wants, as it did after the Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Venkat Balasubramani
State Law Claims: Notwithstanding rejection of the CFAA claim, the court says Carfax does state a claim under the Virginia Computer Crimes Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:39 pm by GuestPost
 If we reduce the judgment to its core, one might even say that the Court simply reiterated the point made by McCarthy J in the X case in 1992 (repeated by Hardiman J in Roche v Roche) when he stated in, admittedly, more trenchant terms: “In the context of the eight years that have passed since the Amendment was adopted and the two years since Grogan’s case the failure by the legislature to enact the appropriate legislation is no longer just unfortunate;… [read post]