Search for: "State v. Meredith" Results 121 - 140 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 12:51 pm
Meredith points out in the dissent, basic mathematical principles mandate a different conclusion. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:51 pm
Meredith points out in the dissent, basic mathematical principles mandate a different conclusion. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Jeff Welty
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
Jaeger VA Regional Office: Cleveland, Ohio Veteran’s Representative at BVA: The American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 20, 2017 Date of CAVC Decision: July 12, 2019 The post PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: Buffington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract:In deciding Meredith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Contreras and Meredith Jacob, is a must read for those IP practitioners and scholars involved in technology development and standardisation.IP EnforcementWhen it comes to IP enforcement, Chinese IP maths: 3 + 15 = more than 18? [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:48 am by Chris Attig
  I work diligently to state the argument as clearly as I can, while at the same time objectively explaining each parties arguments. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State’s submissions were clear as to the result. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]