Search for: "State v. Michael I."
Results 121 - 140
of 6,519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
In his article, "Queer Trademarks," Michael P. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In a later post, I’ll explain why Trump has turned away from his earlier “officer under the United States” argument. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
I kid you not. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Today represents Part 2A which covers Sections I-V of Chief Justice Crampton’s decision. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
The Example of X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)) To illustrate the argument, I choose a UK case that enters into a direct dialogue with Susanne Gössl’s reflection about the notion of habitual residence (see post (2)). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See generally Michael Stern, Amarica's Constitutional Crisis: A Kinda Intellectual History of the Office/Officer Controversy, Point of Order (Jan. 5, 2024), <http://tinyurl.com/6xu6x43r> (listing Akhil Amar's former-student protegees, e.g., Professor Kalt, Professor Chafetz, and Benjamin Cassady). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
I'm delighted to pass along this item from Prof. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am
Question: I applied for my SPC in reliance on the law as set out in Neurim[1], following Santen[2] can I still obtain my SPC? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
I'm not one of those people who believe that the federal government was behind 9/11 or that the "deep state" (and/or Illuminati) controls the nation, but I do believe that the government substantially oversteps at times. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Monday, February 19, I'll be speaking on The Next Big Abortion Rights Case (FDA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
I. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
State, 275 Ga. [read post]