Search for: "State v. Michael I." Results 121 - 140 of 6,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Today represents Part 2A which covers Sections I-V of Chief Justice Crampton’s decision. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Etienne Farnoux
The Example of X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)) To illustrate the argument, I choose a UK case that enters into a direct dialogue with Susanne Gössl’s reflection about the notion of habitual residence (see post (2)). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
See generally Michael Stern, Amarica's Constitutional Crisis: A Kinda Intellectual History of the Office/Officer Controversy, Point of Order (Jan. 5, 2024), <http://tinyurl.com/6xu6x43r> (listing Akhil Amar's former-student protegees, e.g., Professor Kalt, Professor Chafetz, and Benjamin Cassady). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am by Katie Cambrook (Bristows)
Question: I applied for my SPC in reliance on the law as set out in Neurim[1], following Santen[2] can I still obtain my SPC? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
I'm not one of those people who believe that the federal government was behind 9/11 or that the "deep state" (and/or Illuminati) controls the nation, but I do believe that the government substantially oversteps at times. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Monday, February 19, I'll be speaking on The Next Big Abortion Rights Case (FDA v. [read post]